SB 929 passes: all California special districts must have websites

Posted Sloane Dell'Orto on September 21, 2018

A bill that requires all independent special districts in California to have a website was signed into law by Governor Brown this month. State Sen. Mike McGuire’s SB 929 – the Special Districts Transparency Act – requires every independent special district in California to create and consistently maintain a website with specific and detailed information including meeting agendas, clear information on the district’s budget and expenditures, compensation reports, information on how to contact representatives of the district, and more.

The California Special District Association (CSDA), which typically resists state mandated programs related to special districts, sponsored the bill, with unanimous support from its member districts.

From the CSDA website:

In response to requests from the State Legislature and the Little Hoover Commission, and in furtherance of CSDA’s efforts to increase the awareness, accessibility, and transparency of special districts, CSDA is sponsoring SB 929 (McGuire), which will require all special districts to have a website by 2020.
There have been discussions in the Legislature for years regarding a perceived lack of transparency when it comes to special districts, partially due to the sheer number of districts that don’t have websites. There are over 2,000 special districts in California, however less than half of those districts have a website. These statistics led the Little Hoover Commission, in its 2017 report on special district entitled Special Districts: Improving Oversight & Transparency, to recommend that the Legislature require every special district have a website. It was this increased scrutiny from the Legislature and the recent Little Hoover Commission report that led to CSDA’s decision to act rather than be acted upon.

To go back in time a bit

In May, 2000, The Little Hoover Commission investigated special districts and released the report Special Districts: Relics of the Past or Resources for the Future?

They revisited special districts in 2017 and created another report that offers a multitude of suggestions for content that should be required on district websites: http://www.lhc.ca.gov/report/special-districts-improving-oversight-transparency (Streamline is even mentioned as an affordable way to comply, we were very proud.)

There are a few exceptions

Note that there is the ability for a district to pass a resolution annually, claiming a hardship exemption. Some reasons for this may include:

  • Lack of access to broadband Internet
  • Insufficient staff to maintain a website
  • Inadequate financial resources

We definitely agree the first item is a barrier, but the second and third items shouldn’t be. With pricing that starts at $10 per month for the smallest districts, and a system that’s so easy to use that some of our special districts with a single part time employee keep their sites up to date, there’s no barrier to having a website today.

Compliance doesn't have to be hard–we can help!

If you'd like to check out a free  customized demo for your special district with absolutely no obligation, sign up today! We'll build a site within a day or two, then hop on a screen share to show you how easy this can be.

Topics: California compliance Website requirements